Majjhima Nikāya
					II. Majjhima-Paṇṇāsa
					1. Gahapati Vagga
					The Middle Length Sayings
					II. The Middle Fifty Discourses
					1. The Division on Householders
					Sutta 54
Potaliya Suttaṁ
Discourse to Potaliya
Translated from the Pali by I.B. Horner, O.B.E., M.A.
					Associate of Newham College, Cambridge
					First Published in 1954
Copyright The Pali Text Society
					Commercial Rights Reserved
					![]()
					For details see Terms of Use.
[1][chlm][than][ntbb][upal] THUS have I heard:
At one time the Lord was staying near Aṅguttarāpa.[1]
Āpaṇa[2] was a market town in Aṅguttarāpa.
Then the Lord, having dressed in the morning,
					taking his bowl and robe,
					entered Āpaṇa for almsfood.
When he had walked for almsfood in Āpaṇa
					and was returning from the alms-gathering after the meal,
					he approached a certain forest-thicket for the day-sojoum;
					and having plunged into that forest-thicket
					he sat down at the root of a tree.
And the householder Potaliya,[3]
					who was constantly pacing up and down
					and roaming about on foot,
					fully dressed[4] and clothed,[4]
					with parasol and slippers,
					approached that forest-thicket;
					having plunged into that forest-thicket,
					he approached the Lord;
					having approached,
					he exchanged greetings with the Lord;
					having conversed in a friendly and courteous way,
					he stood at a respectful distance.
Then the Lord spoke thus
					to the householder Potaliya
					as he was standing at a respectful distance:
"There are seats, householder;
					if you wish,
					do sit down."
When this had been said,
					the householder Potaliya
					thinking:
"The recluse Gotama addresses me
					with the word 'householder'",
					angry,
					displeased,
					became silent.
And a second time
					the Lord spoke thus to the householder Potaliya:
"There are [26] seats, householder;
					if you wish,
					do sit down."
And a second time
					the householder Potaliya
					thinking:
"The recluse Gotama addresses me
					with the word 'householder'",
					angry,
					displeased,
					became silent.
And a third time
					the Lord spoke thus to the householder Potaliya:
"There are seats, householder;
					if you wish,
					do sit down."
When this had been said,
					the householder Potaliya
					thinking:
"The recluse Gotama addresses me
					with the word 'householder'",
					angry,
					displeased,
					spoke thus to the Lord:
"This, [360] good Gotama, is not proper,
					it is not suitable,
					that you should address me
					with the word 'householder.' "
"But you, householder,
					have all the characteristic marks and signs
					of a householder."
"But all relevant occupations
					have been abandoned by me, good Gotama,
					all avocations given up."
"But, householder,
					how have all occupations been abandoned by you,
					all avocations given up?"
"As to this, good Gotama,
					I handed over to my sons
					as their inheritance
					all that I had of wealth
					or grain
					or silver
					or gold.
Without giving advice or blame in these matters
					I live on a minimum
					of food and covering.[5]
This is how all occupations have been abandoned by me, good Gotama,
					all avocations given up."
"But what you, householder, call
					a giving up of avocations
					is one thing;
					but in the discipline for an ariyan
					the giving up of avocations
					is another thing."
"And what, revered sir,
					is the giving up of avocations
					in the discipline for an ariyan?
It would be good, revered sir,
					if the Lord were to teach me dhamma
					as to that which is the giving up of avocations
					in the discipline for an ariyan."
"Well then, householder, listen,
					attend carefully
					and I will speak."
"Yes, revered sir,"
					the householder Potaliya answered the Lord in assent.
The Lord spoke thus:
"Householder, these eight things
					conduce to the giving up of avocations
					in the discipline for an ariyan.[6]
What eight?
Through no onslaught on creatures,
					onslaught on creatures should be got rid of;
through taking what is given,
					taking what is not given should be got rid of;
through speaking truth,
					lying speech should be got rid of;
through unslanderous speech,
					slanderous speech should be got rid of;
through non-covetise and greed,
					covetise and greed should be got rid of;
through no angry fault-finding,
					angry fault-finding should be got [27] rid of;
through no wrathful rage,
					wrathful rage should be got rid of;
through no arrogance,
					arrogance should be got rid of.
These are the eight things, householder,
					spoken of in brief,
					not explained in detail,
					that, in the discipline for an ariyan,
					conduce to the giving up of avocations."
"As to these eight things, revered sir,
					which are spoken of in brief,
					not explained in detail,
					and which, in the discipline for an ariyan,
					conduce to the giving up of avocations,
					it were good, revered sir,
					if the Lord
					out of compassion
					were to explain these eight things to me in detail."
"Well then, householder, listen,
					attend carefully
					and I will speak."
"Yes, revered sir,"
					the householder Potaliya answered the Lord in assent.
The Lord spoke thus:
[361]"When I said:
'Through no onslaught on creatures,
					on-slaught on creatures should be got rid of' -
in reference to what was this said?
As to this, householder,
					an ariyan disciple reflects thus:
'I am faring along
					for getting rid of
					and abandoning
					those fetters of which
					onslaught on creatures might be a cause;
					for if I were to make onslaught on creatures,
					not only would self upbraid me
					as a result of making onslaught on creatures,
					but intelligent men (also)
					after scrutinising,
					would blame me[7]
					as a result of making onslaught on creatures;
					and at the breaking up of the body after dying
					a bad bourne would be expected
					as a result of making onslaught on creatures.
This is indeed a fetter,
					this is a hindrance,
					that is to say onslaught on creatures.
But for one who refrains
					from onslaught on creatures
					there are not those destructive and consuming cankers[8]
					that might arise as a result
					of making onslaught on creatures.'
When I said:
'Through no onslaught on creatures,
					onslaught on creatures should be got rid of,'
it was said in reference to this."
■
"When I said:
'Through taking what is given,
					taking what is not given should be got rid of' -
in reference to what was this said?
As to this, householder,
					an ariyan disciple reflects thus:
'I am faring along
					for getting rid of
					and abandoning
					those fetters of which
					taking what is not given might be a cause;
					for if I were to take what is not given,
					not only would self upbraid me
					as a result of taking what is not given,
					but intelligent men (also)
					after scrutinising,
					would blame me
					as a result of taking what is not given;
					and at the breaking up of the body after dying
					a bad bourne would be expected
					as a result of taking what is not given.
This is indeed a fetter,
					this is a hindrance,
					that is to say taking what is not given.
But for one who refrains
					from taking what is not given
					there are not those destructive and consuming cankers
					that might arise as a result
					of taking what is not given.'
When I said:
'Through taking what is given,
					taking what is not given should be got rid of,'
it was said in reference to this."
■
"When I said:
'Through speaking truth,
					lying speech should be got rid of' -
in reference to what was this said?
As to this, householder,
					an ariyan disciple reflects thus:
'I am faring along
					for getting rid of
					and abandoning
					those fetters of which
					lying speech might be a cause;
					for if I were use lying speech,
					not only would self upbraid me
					as a result of using lying speech,
					but intelligent men (also)
					after scrutinising,
					would blame me
					as a result of using lying speech;
					and at the breaking up of the body after dying
					a bad bourne would be expected
					as a result of using lying speech.
This is indeed a fetter,
					this is a hindrance,
					that is to say using lying speech.
But for one who refrains
					from using lying speech
					there are not those destructive and consuming cankers
					that might arise as a result
					of using lying speech.'
When I said:
'Through speaking truth,
					lying speech should be got rid of,'
it was said in reference to this."
■
"When I said:
'Through unslanderous speech,
					slanderous speech should be got rid of' -
in reference to what was this said?
As to this, householder,
					an ariyan disciple reflects thus:
'I am faring along
					for getting rid of
					and abandoning
					those fetters of which
					slanderous speech might be a cause;
					for if I were to use slanderous speech,
					not only would self upbraid me
					as a result of using slanderous speech,
					but intelligent men (also)
					after scrutinising,
					would blame me
					as a result of using slanderous speech;
					and at the breaking up of the body after dying
					a bad bourne would be expected
					as a result of using slanderous speech.
This is indeed a fetter,
					this is a hindrance,
					that is to say using slanderous speech.
But for one who refrains
					from using slanderous speech
					there are not those destructive and consuming cankers
					that might arise as a result
					of using slanderous speech.'
When I said:
'Through unslanderous speech,
					slanderous speech should be got rid of,'
it was said in reference to this."
■
"When I said:
'Through non-covetise and greed,
					covetise and greed should be got rid of' -
in reference to what was this said?
As to this, householder,
					an ariyan disciple reflects thus:
'I am faring along
					for getting rid of
					and abandoning
					those fetters of which
					covetise and greed might be a cause;
					for if I were covetous and greedy,
					not only would self upbraid me
					as a result of covetise and greed,
					but intelligent men (also)
					after scrutinising,
					would blame me
					as a result of covetise and greed;
					and at the breaking up of the body after dying
					a bad bourne would be expected
					as a result of covetise and greed.
This is indeed a fetter,
					this is a hindrance,
					that is to say covetise and greed.
But for one who refrains
					from covetise and greed
					there are not those destructive and consuming cankers
					that might arise as a result
					of covetise and greed.'
When I said:
'Through non-covetise and greed,
					covetise and greed should be got rid of,'
it was said in reference to this."
■
"When I said:
'Through no angry fault-finding,
					angry fault-finding should be got rid of' -
in reference to what was this said?
As to this, householder,
					an ariyan disciple reflects thus:
'I am faring along
					for getting rid of
					and abandoning
					those fetters of which
					angry fault-finding might be a cause;
					for if I were angry and fault-finding,
					not only would self upbraid me
					as a result of angry fault-finding,
					but intelligent men (also)
					after scrutinising,
					would blame me
					as a result of angry fault-finding;
					and at the breaking up of the body after dying
					a bad bourne would be expected
					as a result of angry fault-finding.
This is indeed a fetter,
					this is a hindrance,
					that is to say angry fault-finding.
But for one who refrains
					from angry fault-finding
					there are not those destructive and consuming cankers
					that might arise as a result
					of angry fault-finding.'
When I said:
'Through no angry fault-finding,
					angry fault-finding should be got rid of,'
it was said in reference to this."
■
"When I said:
'Through no wrathful rage,
					wrathful rage should be got rid of' -
in reference to what was this said?
As to this, householder,
					an ariyan disciple reflects thus:
'I am faring along
					for getting rid of
					and abandoning
					those fetters of which
					wrathful rage might be a cause;
					for if I were wrathful and enraged,
					not only would self upbraid me
					as a result of wrathful rage,
					but intelligent men (also)
					after scrutinising,
					would blame me
					as a result of wrathful rage;
					and at the breaking up of the body after dying
					a bad bourne would be expected
					as a result of wrathful rage.
This is indeed a fetter,
					this is a hindrance,
					that is to say wrathful rage.
But for one who refrains
					from wrathful rage
					there are not those destructive and consuming cankers
					that might arise as a result
					of wrathful rage.'
When I said:
'Through no wrathful rage,
					wrathful rage should be got rid of,'
it was said in reference to this."
■
"When I said:
'Through no arrogance,
					arrogance should be got rid of' -
in reference to what was this said?
As to this, householder,
					an ariyan disciple reflects thus:
'I am faring along
					for getting rid of
					and abandoning
					those fetters of which
					arrogance might be a cause;
					for if I were arrogant,
					not only would self upbraid me
					as a result of arrogance,
					but intelligent men (also)
					after scrutinising,
					would blame me
					as a result of arrogance;
					and at the breaking up of the body after dying
					a bad bourne would be expected
					as a result of arrogance.
This is indeed a fetter,
					this is a hindrance,
					that is to say arrogance.
But for one who refrains
					from arrogance
					there are not those destructive and consuming cankers
					that might arise as a result
					of arrogance.'
When I said:
'Through no arrogance,
					arrogance should be got rid of,'
it was said in reference to this."
[364]"These, householder, are the eight things spoken of in brief,
					(now) explained in detail,
					that, in the discipline for an ariyan,
					conduce to the giving up of a vocations.
But not even yet
					in the [28] discipline for an ariyan
					is there an entire giving up in every way
					of all avocations."
"But how is it, revered sir,
					in the discipline for an ariyan
					there is an entire giving up in every way
					of all avocations?
It were good, revered sir,
					if the Lord were to teach me dhamma as to how,
					in the discipline for an ariyan,
					there is an entire giving up in every way
					of all avocations."
"Well then, householder, listen,
					attend carefully
					and I will speak."
"Yes, revered sir,"
					the householder Potaliya answered the Lord in assent.
The Lord spoke thus:
"It is, householder,
					as if a dog,
					overcome by hunger and exhaustion[9]
					were to happen on a slaughtering place for cows,
					and the skilled cattle-butcher there
					or his apprentice
					were to fling him a bone,
					scraped
					and well scraped,
					fleshless,
					but with a smearing of blood.
What do you think about this, householder?
Could that dog,
					gnawing such a bone,
					scraped and well scraped,
					fleshless,
					but with a smearing of blood,
					appease his hunger and exhaustion?'
"No, revered sir.
What is the reason for this?
That bone, revered sir,
					is scraped and well scraped,
					fleshless,
					but although it has a smearing of blood,
					that dog would be worn out with fatigue
					or ever he got anything from it."
"Even so, householder,
					an ariyan disciple reflects thus:
'Pleasures of the senses
					have been likened to a skeleton[10] by the Lord,
					of much pain,
					of much tribulation,
					wherein is more peril.'
And having seen this thus
					as it really is
					by means of perfect wisdom,
					having avoided[11] that which is equanimity in face of multiformity,[12]
					resting on multiformity,
					he develops that equanimity
					which is equanimity in face of uniformity,
					resting on uniformity,
					wherein all graspings
					after the material things of the world
					are stopped entirely.
And, householder,
					it is as if a vulture
					or kite
					or hawk
					seizing a lump of flesh
					were to fly upwards,
					and other vultures,
					kites
					and hawks
					following hard after it
					were to tear at it
					and pull it to pieces.[13]
What do you think about this, householder?
If that vulture
					or kite
					or [29] hawk
					were not to let go quickly
					of that lump of flesh,
					would it, from that cause,
					come to death
					or pain like unto death?"
"Yes, revered sir."
"Even so, householder,
					an ariyan disciple reflects thus:
'Pleasures of the senses
					have been likened to a lump of flesh[14] by the Lord,
					of much pain,
					of much tribulation,
					wherein is more peril.'
And having seen this thus
					as it really is
					by means of perfect wisdom,
					having avoided that which is equanimity in face of multiformity,
					resting on multiformity,
					he develops that equanimity
					which is equanimity in face of uniformity,
					resting on uniformity,
					wherein all graspings
					after the material things of the world
					are stopped entirely.
And, householder,
					it is as though a man might come along
					bringing a blazing grass torch[15]
					against the wind.
What do you think about this, householder?
If that man were not to let go quickly
					of that blazing grass torch,
					would it burn his hand
					or burn his arm
					or burn another part of his body
					so that, from that cause,
					he would come to death
					or pain like unto death?"
"Yes, revered sir."
"Even so, householder,
					an ariyan disciple reflects thus:
'Pleasures of the senses
					have been likened by the Lord to a grass torch,[16],
					of much pain,
					of much tribulation,
					wherein is more peril.'
And having seen this thus
					as it really is
					by means of perfect wisdom,
					having avoided that which is equanimity in face of multiformity,
					resting on multiformity,
					he develops that equanimity
					which is equanimity in face of uniformity,
					resting on uniformity,
					wherein all graspings
					after the material things of the world
					are stopped entirely.
And, householder,
					it is as if there might be a pit of glowing embers,
					deeper than a man's height,
					full of embers
					that were neither flaming nor smoking,[17]
					and a man might come along
					wanting to live,
					not wanting to die,
					wanting happiness,
					recoiling from pain;
					but two strong men,
					having grasped hold of his arms,
					might drag him towards
					that pit of glowing embers.
What do you think about this, householder?
Would not that man
					twist his body
					this way
					and that?"[18]
"Yes, revered sir.
What is the reason for this?
Revered sir, that man realizes:
'If I fall down
					into this pit of glowing embers,
					from that cause
					I will come to death
					or pain like unto death.'"
"Even so, householder,
					an ariyan disciple reflects thus:
'Pleasures of the senses
					have been likened by the Lord
					to a pit of glowing embers,[19],
					of much pain,
					of much tribulation,
					wherein is more peril.'
And having seen this thus
					as it really is
					by means of perfect wisdom,
					having avoided that which is equanimity in face of multiformity,
					resting on multiformity,
					he develops that equanimity
					which is equanimity in face of uniformity,
					resting on uniformity,
					wherein all graspings
					after the material things of the world
					are stopped entirely.
[30] And, householder,
					it is as if a man might see in a dream
					delightful parks,
					delightful woods,
					delightful stretches of level ground
					and delightful lakes;
					but on waking up
					could see nothing.
Even so, householder,
					an ariyan disciple reflects thus:
'Pleasures of the senses
					have been likened by the Lord
					to a dream,
					of much pain,
					of much tribulation,
					wherein is more peril.'
And having seen this thus
					as it really is
					by means of perfect wisdom,
					having avoided that which is equanimity in face of multiformity,
					resting on multiformity,
					he develops that equanimity
					which is equanimity in face of uniformity,
					resting on uniformity,
					wherein all graspings
					after the material things of the world
					are stopped entirely.
And, householder,
					it is as if a man,
					having borrowed[20] a loan of wealth,
					[366]a fashionable[21] vehicle
					and splendid jewels and ear-ornaments,
					might go forth into the bazaar,
					honoured for his loan of wealth,
					surrounded by it,
					so that people having seen him
					might say:
'This man is indeed wealthy,
					and undoubtedly wealthy men
					enjoy their wealth thus';
but the veritable owners,
					wherever they might, see him,
					might take away what was theirs.
What do you think about this, householder?
Would that man have had enough
					of being other (than what he is)?"
"Yes, revered sir.
What is the reason for this?
It is, revered sir,
					that the veritable owners
					take away what is theirs."
"Even so, householder,
					an ariyan disciple reflects thus:
'Pleasures of the senses
					have been likened by the Lord
					to what is borrowed,
					of much pain,
					of much tribulation,
					wherein is more peril.'
And having seen this thus
					as it really is
					by means of perfect wisdom,
					having avoided that which is equanimity in face of multiformity,
					resting on multiformity,
					he develops that equanimity
					which is equanimity in face of uniformity,
					resting on uniformity,
					wherein all graspings
					after the material things of the world
					are stopped entirely.
And, householder,
					it is as if in a dense forest thicket
					not far from a village or a market town
					there might be a tree
					laden with ripe fruit,
					but with no fruit fallen to the ground;
					and a man might come along
					walking about and aiming at fruit,
					seeking for fruit,
					looking about for fruit;
					having plunged into that forest thicket,
					he might see that tree
					laden with ripe fruit,
					and it might occur to him:
'This tree is laden with ripe fruit,
					but no fruit has fallen to the ground.
However, I know how to climb a tree.
Suppose that I,
					having climbed this tree,
					should eat as much as I like
					and should fill my clothes?
So he, having climbed that tree,
					might eat as much as he liked
					and might fill his clothes.[22]
Then a second man might come [31] along
					walking about and aiming at fruit,
					seeking for fruit,
					looking about for fruit,
					and bringing a sharp axe.
Having plunged into that forest thicket,
					he might see that tree
					laden with ripe fruit,
					and it might occur to him:
'This tree is laden with ripe fruit
					but no fruit has fallen to the ground.
Now, I don't know how to climb a tree,
					so suppose that I,
					having cut down this tree at the root,
					should eat as much as I like
					and should fill my clothes?
So he might cut down this tree at the root.
What do you think about this, householder?
Unless he came down very quickly,
					would not that tree in falling
					crush the hand
					or the foot
					or another part of the body
					of that man who had first climbed the tree,
					[367]so that, from that cause
					he might come to death
					or to pain like unto death?"
"Yes, revered sir."
"Even so, householder,
					an ariyan disciple reflects thus:
'Pleasures of the senses
					have been likened by the Lord
					to the fruits of a tree,
					of much pain,
					of much tribulation,
					wherein is more peril.'
And having seen this thus
					as it really is
					by means of perfect wisdom,
					having avoided that which is equanimity in face of multiformity,
					resting on multiformity,
					he develops that equanimity
					which is equanimity in face of uniformity,
					resting on uniformity,
					wherein all graspings
					after the material things of the world
					are stopped entirely.
This ariyan disciple, householder,
					who has come to this matchless purification
					through equanimity and mindfulness,
					recollects a variety of former habitations,
					that is to say:
One birth,
					two births,
					three births,
					four births,
					five births,
					ten births,
					twenty births,
					thirty births,
					forty births,
					fifty births,
					a hundred births,
					a thousand births,
					a hundred thousand births,
					and many an eon of integration
					and many an eon of disintegration
					and many an eon of integration-disintegration;
					such a one was I by name,
					having such and such a clan,
					such and such a colour,
					so was I nourished,
					such and such pleasant and painful experiences were mine,
					so did the span of life end.
Passing from this,
					I came to be in another state
					where such a one was I by name,
					having such and such a clan,
					such and such a colour,
					so was I nourished,
					such and such pleasant and painful experiences were mine,
					so did the span of life end.
Passing from this,
					I arose here.
Thus he remembers divers former abodes in all their modes and detail.
This ariyan disciple, householder,
					who has come to this matchless purification
					through equanimity and mindfulness,
					with the purified deva-vision
					surpassing that of men,
					sees beings as they pass hence
					or come to be;
					he comprehends that beings are mean,
					excellent,
					comely,
					ugly,
					well-going,
					ill-going,
					according to the consequences of their deeds,
					and he thinks:
Indeed these worthy beings
					who were possessed of wrong conduct in body,
					who were possessed of wrong conduct of speech,
					who were possessed of wrong conduct of thought,
					scoffers at the ariyans,
					holding a wrong view,
					incurring deeds consequent on a wrong view -
					these, at the breaking up of the body after dying,
					have arisen in a sorrowful state,
					a bad bourn,
					the abyss,
					Niraya Hell.
But these worthy beings
					who were possessed of good conduct in body,
					who were possessed of good conduct in speech,
					who were possessed of good conduct in thought,
					who did not scoff at the ariyans,
					holding a right view,
					incurring deeds consequent on a right view -
					these, at the breaking up of the body after dying,
					have arisen in a good bourn,
					a heaven world.
Thus with the purified deva-vision
					surpassing that of men
					he sees beings as they pass hence
					or come to be;
					he comprehends that beings are mean,
					excellent,
					comely,
					ugly,
					well-going,
					ill-going,
					according to the consequences of their deeds.
This ariyan disciple, householder,
					who has come to this matchless purification
					through equanimity and mindfulness,
					by the destruction of the cankers
					having here-now realized by his own super-knowledge
					the freedom of mind
					and the freedom through wisdom
					that are cankerless,
					enters and abides therein.
It is to this extent, householder,
					that in the discipline for an ariyan
					there is an entire giving up in every way
					of all avocations.
What do you think about this, householder?
Do you behold in yourself
					a giving up of avocations
					such as is, in the discipline for an ariyan,
					an entire giving up in every way
					of all avocations?"
"Who am I, revered sir,
					that there is an entire giving up
					of all [32] avocations
					in every way?
I, revered sir,
					am far from the entire giving up in every way
					of all avocations
					according to the discipline for an ariyan.
For hitherto we, revered sir,
					deemed wanderers belonging to other sects
					to be superior
					although they are inferior;
					although they are inferior
					we offered them food for superiors;
					although they are inferior
					we placed them
					in places for superiors.
And we, revered sir,
					deemed monks to be inferior
					although they are superior;
					although they are superior
					we offered them food for inferiors;
					although they are superior
					we placed them in places
					for inferiors.
But now we, revered sir,
					[368]will know that wanderers belonging to other sects,
					being inferior,
					are inferior;
					because they are inferior
					we will offer them food for inferiors;
					because they are inferior
					we will place them in places
					for inferiors.
And we, revered sir,
					will know that monks,
					being superior,
					are superior;
					because they are superior
					we will offer them food for superiors;
					because they are superior
					we will place them in places
					for superiors.
Indeed, revered sir,
					the Lord has inspired in me
					a recluse's regard for recluses,
					a recluse's satisfaction in recluses,
					a recluse's reverence for recluses.
It is excellent, revered sir,
					it is excellent, revered sir.
Revered sir, it is as if one might set upright
					what had been upset,
					or might disclose what what was covered,
					or show the way
					to one who had gone astray,
					or bring an oil-lamp into the darkness
					so that those with vision
					might see material shapes -
					even so in many a figure
					has dhamma been made clear by the Lord.
I, revered sir,
					am going to the Lord for refuge
					and to dhamma
					and to the Order of monks.
May the Lord accept me as a lay follower
					going for refuge
					from this day forth
					for as long as life lasts."
Discourse to Potaliya
					The Fourth
[1] MA. iii. 34, Aṅga was a district. Not far north of the waters of the river Mahī, there was Uttarāpa. Aṅguttarāpa mentioned at M. i. 447, Vin. i. 243, Sn. p. 102.
[2] So called because it had many shops and bazaars, MA. iii. 37.
[3] He possibly became the wanderer Potaliya, of A. ii. 100 f.
[4] nivāsa and pāvuraṇa refer to putting on of different garments (or cloths), the former to the loin-cloth or under garment, and the latter to the shoulder-cloth or outer garment. MA. iii. 38 distinguishes between these two cloths (the attire of the ordinary Indian), and says the former had a long fringe.
[6] Cf. M. iii. 29; Vin. iv. 2; D. iii. 232; A. ii. 246, iv. 307.
[7] attā pi māṁ upavadeyya anuvicca viññū garaheyyum; cf. A. i. 57, iii. 255, 267-8, all reading attā pi attānaṁ upavadati. See G.S. i. 52, n. 3 on anuvicca, translated above as "scrutinising," following MA. iii. 40 which explains by tulayitvā pariyogahetvā, having weighed, having scrutinised (or examined).
"Canker": Āsava. The four Corrupting Influences: sense pleasures, living, blindness, and opinions.
 — p.p.
[8] MA. iii. 40-42 states which single canker arises, or which two or which three arise, out of the total of four, for each one of the eight things so long as these have not been extirpated.
[10] Cf. M. i. 130. For the following things to which pleasures of the senses are likened, see B.D. iii. 22 f. (Vin. iv. 134} and notes.
[11] abkinivajjetvā, as at M. i. 111; D. iii. 113.
Upekkhā nānattā nānattasitā and upekkhā ekattā ekattasitā Detachment based on diversity and detachment based on uniformity. What this means is that 1. the individual may himself be diverse in nature or unified, and 2. there is a detachment towards experience arising from the senses (detachment, or impassivity, or equanimity or poise when experiencing the 6 objects of sense); and there is detachment from that which is unified (the four formless realms and the state of the ending of perception and sense-experience); and there is detachment from any and all experience arising from the senses. This is precisely the difference between 'equanimity' and 'detachment' and why 'detachment' is the better translation for upekkhā. There can be a worldly sort of detachment (equanimity) but there cannot be an equanimity without worldly objects.
 — p.p.
[12] Cf. M. iii. 220. "Multiformity" consists of the five sensual qualities, "uniformity" of the four jhānas, MA. iii. 43.
[13] Cf. Vin. iii. 105; S. ii. 255.
[14] Cf. M. i. 145.
[15] Cf. M. i. 128.
[16] Cf. S. ii. 152.
[18] Aa at M. i. 507.
[19] Cf. D. iii. 283; S. iv. 188; A. iv. 224, v. 175; Sn. 396.
[20] Or, begged, yācitvā. Trenekner suggests yāceyya, M. i. 574.[ed1]
[21] poroseyya. P.E.D. rejects the derivation from purisa, as at MA. iii. 44, and says the word is derived from pura, a town. However, the text is corrupt here; see v.l. at M. i. 56l, 574.[ed1]
[22] ucchaṅga, used in a similar sense here and at Vin. i. 225. Probably meaning the man knotted his cloth garment so as to carry the fruit.
[ed1] These refer to a section at the back of the hard-copy which gives alternative readings.